Barack Obama is a communist

Trotskyism or Leninism?

MATERIALISM and EMPIRIO-CRITICISM

Obama's "New Party" had the Marxism-Leninism Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism began in 1991 when approximately one third of the Communist Party USA membership split from the party to form a new organization. In 2000, Committees of Correspondence (CoC or CofC) became Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS).

Sam Webb, chairman of the CPUSA, introduced social democracy!

Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism

AAC part 1 1.27 MB

Vorbis 1.66 MB

AAC part2 4.29 MB

Vorbis part 2 6.97 MB

AAC part 3 3.29 MB

Vorbis part 3 4.67 MB

AAC pt 4 4.09 MB <-- Background on how Obama is like Adolf Hitler such as printing money!

Vorbis part 4 5.30 MB

AAC pt 5 - Obamacare is Unconstitutional, because not only can't we afford it without reducing 60% of the military expenditure (that goes to Americorps).

Vorbis pt 5

Obama is communist Part 2 AAC 5.49 MB

Obama is a communist AAC 2.49 MB

Obama is a Communist Vorbis 3.50 MB

Obama is a communist part 2 Ogg 9.49 MB

Obama is communist Part 2 (mirror) AAC 5.49 MB

Obama
is a Marxist part 3 5.95 MB

Obama
is a marxist part 3 9.50 MB

Karl Rove on Iran and Senator Todd AAC 776 KB

^ Yes, President GW tried to do something about Fanny and Freddy, no one is surprised even! ^

Karl
Rove on Iran and Senator Todd Vorbis 1.1 MB

Dictatorship of the Proletariat (capitalist to socialism transition)

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=MCVDIQOB (temporary)

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=C42IOFX1 (temporary)

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=8F11DCB6 (temporary)

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W186190W (temporary)

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=KWHAURIT (temporary)

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QND6C5CA (temporary)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Barack_Obama_%26_Joe_Biden_with_Mikhail_Gorbachev_3-20.09.jpg

http://tehrantimes.com/index.php/world/3944-gorbachev-us-is-like-what-ussr-was-before-breakup-

http://pastehtml.com/view/bfsk5x0sz.html
Obama's Houston campaign headquarters

Literarian Professor says Marxist Obama wants to control society’s entire resources and eliminate society's Makeshifts

mirror url

Arguing with Idiots audio book mp3 120 MB

Mchill calls 2013 bankruptcy?

Massachusetts Treasurer Tim Cahill: Kill the Bill

Obama written some books about himself, Marxist and Leon Trotsky-inspired race baiting statements inside

Obama’s call to move “forward.” “Forward!” in fact was one of the Soviets’ favorite slogans.
Obamacare is a 5 year plan. There is also a five year plan on offshore drilling. There is a 5 year plan on NASA budget freeze.

The New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials — most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.

Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.

The New Party’s modus operandi included the political strategy of “electoral fusion,” where it would nominate, for various political offices, candidates from other parties (usually Democrats), thereby enabling each of those candidates to occupy more than one ballot line in the voting booth. By so doing, the New Party often was able to influence candidates’ platforms. (Fusion of this type is permitted in seven states — Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, South Carolina, and Vermont — but is common only in New York.)

Though Illinois was not one of the states that permitted electoral fusion, in 1995 Barack Obama nonetheless sought the New Party’s endorsement for his 1996 state senate run. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers.

In 1996, three of the four candidates endorsed by the New Party won their electoral primaries. The three victors included Barack Obama (in the 13th State Senate District), Danny Davis (in the 7th Congressional District), and Patricia Martin, who won the race for Judge in the 7th Subcircuit Court. All four candidates attended an April 11, 1996 New Party membership meeting to express their gratitude for the party’s support.

The New Party’s various chapters similarly helped to elect dozens of other political candidates in a host of American cities.

One of the more notable New Party members was Carl Davidson, a Chicago-based Marxist who became a political supporter of Barack Obama in the mid-1990s.

In 1997 the New Party’s influence declined precipitously after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that electoral fusion was not protected by the First Amendment’s freedom of association clause. By 1998 the party was essentially defunct. Daniel Canto and other key party members went on to establish a new organization with similar ideals, the Working Families Party of New York.

This news pretty much confirms that Barack Obama is at the very least a neo-Marxist and also confirms the claim that he is one of the most far left leaning Senators we have in office today.

This man is no “new” politician, no “centrist,” and not interested in ever “reaching across the aisle.” This whole “new way” line of bunkum is all smoke a mirrors.


In fact, at no time have any of the fundamentals of left-wing economic and political theories originated in the United States. The Marxian socialist theories were brought to the United States by German immigrants. The Leninist-Stalinist doctrines were distilled in Russia. The Fabian socialist theories with their Keynesian garb originated in England. Mr. Keynes, following Karl Marx, used the great corporation as an institution increasingly ripe for state control or outright ownership. He finds many parallels with the state trusts of Soviet Russia. the Fabian-Keynesian technique influenced the Communists to such an extent that some of the top Communist Party leadership wanted to accept the Fabian form completely. Earl Browder as secretary of the Communist Party in 1945 proposed its dissolution and the reorganization of the Communists into an educational institution. This body should put up no election candidates of its own and would ‘be non-partisan in character. The Keynesians and the Communists remain blood-brothers to the end.

Many Trotskyists argue that workers in "oppressor" nations (such as the USA or Israel) must first support national liberation movements in "oppressed" nations (such as Afghanistan or Palestine) before there can be any basis for proletarian internationalism.Tony Cliff "Israel is not a colony suppressed by imperialism, but a settler’s citadel, a launching pad of imperialism. It is a tragedy that some of the very people who had been persecuted and massacred in such bestial fashion should themselves be driven into a chauvinistic, militaristic fervour, and become the blind tool of imperialism in subjugating the Arab masses."

Proves Pres. Obama is like a Trotskyist by wanting to change Isarel borders. Trotsky's "permanent" revolution is, as Lenin said, "skipping" the peasant movement, "playing at the seizure of power."

Obama's neo-marxist "mainsteam media" vehicle who cheered Hugo Chavez was founded by neo-marxist Robert McChesney. The "Free Press" wanted to do for the U.S. mainstream media what Chavez did to his media....use it as properganda. Pres. Obama wants to nationalize the media. The majority of Americans oppose nationalization of the media. The mainstream media better start a tea party of its own before its too late.

Jerome Corsi - America for Sale says world marxist government conspiracy. Marxist President Obama doesn't want individual nations to exist! He want Earth to have Supreme Ruler and everybody socialist with a mixture of currency. I believe him. Unless we overthrow the regime in White House now. Earth capital in Shanghai.

Yes, Obama has been a communist or Marxist ever since his high school days in Hawaii. He dropped his official enrollment in the various Communist parties to join the Democrat party when he ran for state government, but has maintained close ties the Communist party. This is a 4 yr communist party like the Communist Party USA or the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

Obama stated that a mentor to him in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis, who was a card carrying member of the old Communist Party USA.bama stated that a mentor to him in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis, who was a card carrying member of the old Communist Party USA. Gerald Home, a Senior US Communist, stated while Obama was in Hawaii, "Smith Act trials ... swept the nation from New York City in 1949 when the entire CPUSA leadership was placed on trial, then jailed, to Honolulu where a similar trial occurred in 1952....the response in Honolulu when tens of thousands of workers went on strike when labor and Communist Party leaders were convicted of Smith Act violations in 1953 -- a response totally unlike the response on the mainland."
"Davis's initial contacts with Hawai`i all had extremely strong ILWU ties. Paul Robson's own Hawai`i acquaintances, which he passed on to Davis, insured that "when I came over, one of the first things that I got involved with -- well, I met all the ILWU brass, Jack Hall and all of them, and I went -- they had both of us over to various functions for them --Harriet Bouslog (ILWU lawyer recruited by Bridges who defended the Smith Act case) was also a good friend" (Davis 1986a, 5:29-30). Davis soon realized that he had arrived at a very important moment in Hawai`i labor history. The huge International Longshoreman's Workers Union (ILWU) strike was imminent, pitting labor against the Big Five. For Davis, this was the kind of political ferment and struggle between the powerful and powerless that he thrived upon...."

Rogers of the Center for Wisconsin Strategy, Madison WI, formed the New Party (NP), a Marxist coalition that endorsed and helped elect left-wing political candidates with Barack Obama being a member. In 1995, Obama successfully obtained the endorsement of the New Party for his upcoming state senate run, drawing on the organization for campaign workers.

He writes in his book that when he was 'confused', he would seek out communist rallies with Marxist speakers. While at Columbia, he meet Bill Ayers, who was a prominent Communist, and befriended Edward Said, who was the President of Columbia's Communist Party.

The Obama campaign has hired many former communists, and the ones that have been exposed have been fired or quit. For example, Obama's Muslim outreach coordinator, Mazen Asbahi.

Rogers of the Center for Wisconsin Strategy, Madison WI, formed the New Party (NP), a Marxist coalition that endorsed and helped elect left-wing political candidates with Barack Obama being a member. In 1995, Obama successfully obtained the endorsement of the New Party for his upcoming state senate run, drawing on the organization for campaign workers.

He writes in his book that when he was 'confused', he would seek out communist rallies with Marxist speakers. While at Columbia, he meet Bill Ayers, who was a prominent Communist, and befriended Edward Said, who was the President of Columbia's Communist Party.

The Obama campaign has hired many former communists, and the ones that have been exposed have been fired or quit. For example, Obama's Muslim outreach coordinator, Mazen Asbahi.

Sam Graham-Felsen, hired to
run Obama's blog, writes about Noam Chomsky in a Marxist publications
that openly calls for revolution against the American government. This
is a Presidential candidate's choice to run the on-line portion of his
campaign.


Obama's health care, tax, welfare, spending, and foreign relations
policies have all started at highly communist points. During the
primary, and now final campaigns, he has tempered his policies to
address all criticisms, but 'off camera' moments have revealed that
Obama still very much intends to carry through with his original,
highly socialist and communist plans.

Sam Graham-Felsen quote

 




Anita Dunn is a A Self-Admitted Marxist and is the official press cordinator of the marxist White House. She likes Mao Zedong Thought and Mother Teresa

And don't forget smiley face fascist that uses his good looks and convensing attitude to prevent americans from protesting against the 4 trillion of the BTU tax (Al Gore 1993 tax on energy and the democrats hate nuclear for the power generation alone) whilst 2 trillion or more for dytopian nationalized healthcare. If it was an absolute dytopian socialist healthcare like Canada than our economy would tank more as a train wreck. The liberal congress hasn't bailed out congress. His chiefs of staff tell me on Fox News Channel that he wants to us to live with a nuclear Iran which is liberal and something else. Congress need a trillion just to bail out California, the 8th largest economy in the world and I don't want congress to bail out California, because our capitalism would fix itself with Reagonomics. It's the government that is destroying capitalism, not so much Bernie Madoff, Richard Fuld Jr. or tom Petters. The debt is nearly 13 trillion, and Congress hasn't even implemented the 4 trillion BTU tax (tax and trade/green hell) and 2 trillion Obamathcare. Get rid of the possible Communist regime before the US dollar completely fails and we're under the IMF International dollar with China more /w it.t A conspiracy bigger than watergate! China isn't bailing us out. You socialist all are, because there is only 1 party in town, right? California is going to be bailed out too for another trillion. Then these figures will double by 2025.

Barack Obama as FDR is untrue, but its quite interesting that FDR III was working on combining Marxism and capitalism (monopoly State Capitalism) in an attempt to make modern economic systems more fair and less prone to the "winner takes all" scenario. That was FDR III...





http://slp.org (dead in Sept 2008)

http://newunionparty.org (successor deleonist party founded in Minneapolis)

http://www.chronwatch-america.com/articles/3571/1/CPUSA-Supports-Obama-and-Congressional-Democrats/Page1.html

http://freetexthost.com/ay2ap13exj

ACLU Homeland Security DURING A WAR? WTF
Homeland Security is ACLU?

Massachusetts (Tim Cahill) predicted government healthcare would bankrupt the US in 4 years. He has the experience to know of what he speaks. And congressional democrats have the political version Stockholm syndrome (mike Huckabee quote). The type that says I vote no and then 3 minutes later; vote yes.

One thing is for certain, Obama, Harry Reed, and Nancy Polisi are very creepy politicians, something just not right.. the congress acts like Soviet Democracy or along those lines. What we need is to keep privatized insurance as it existed in the past, clean up bankrupted Medicare and cap the spending on that, keep capitalism as small businesses make up the majority of the US economy, build new nuclear power plants, and fight to win wars that threaten our freedom like it always does. I think that Newt Gingrich, John Bolton, Richard Morris, and Sara Palin are great politicans and more in line with my thinking.
Small Business Fail

Small Businesses Fail pt 2

The Trotskyist Johnson-Forest Tendency agrees with the Frankfort school that the USSR is state-capitalist. "The Stalinist bureaucracy,is the American bureaucracy carried to its ultimate and logical conclusion" says C. L. R. James. State Capitalism and World Revolution

"The Soviet Democracy Doctrine"
Democratic party is getting tarp money from the PT party of Brazil so Obama can redistribute wealth to the South America when the Brazilians can just vote for conservative politicians. This is making us poorer and he&#...039;s making an allusion for the PT party to guarantee they're wealthy. They'll helping a fellow Labour party at our expense in a recession. Unconstitutional like Obamacare. The New Zealand Labour Party calls themselves "Progressive" [instead of socialist for PR] and socially liberal, yet this is far left progressism and; therefore, Marxist Progressism. Just listen to an ex-communist (ex-CPUSA) on the Obama is a communist V2.m4a as a reference.

1. Afghanistan Czar: Richard Holbrooke- Ultra liberal anti gun former Gov.of New Mexico. Pro Abortion and legal drug use.

2. AIDS Czar: Jeffrey Crowley Homosexual. A Gay Rights activist.
Believes in Gay Marriage and Special Status, including free health care
for gays.

3. Auto recovery Czar: Ed Montgomery- Black radical anti business
activist. Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks. Univ of
Maryland Business School Dean teaches US business has caused world
poverty. ACORN board member. Communist DuBois Club member.

4. Border Czar: Alan Bersin- former failed superintendent of San Diego.
Ultra Liberal friend of Hilary Clinton. Served as Border Czar under
Janet Reno – to keep borders open to illegals

5. California Water Czar: David J. Hayes Sr. Fellow of radical
environmentalist group, “Progress Policy”. No training or experience in
water management.

6. Car Czar: Ron Bloom- Auto Union worker. Anti business & anti
nuclear. Has worked hard to force US auto makers out of business. Sits
on the Board of Chrysler which is now Auto Union owned. How did this
happen?

7. Central Region Czar: Dennis Ross- Believes US policy has caused Mid
East wars. Obama apologist to the world.. Anti gun and pro abortion.

8. Domestic Violence Czar: Lynn Rosenthal- Director of the National
Network to End Domestic Violence. Vicious anti male feminist. Supported
male castration.

9. Drug Czar: Gil Kerlikowske- devoted lobbyist for every restrictive
gun law proposal, Former Chief of Police in Liberal Seattle. Believes
no American should own a firearm. Supports legalization of drugs.

10. Economic Czar: Paul Volcker - Head of Fed Reserve under Jimmy
Carter when US economy nearly failed. Obama appointed head of the
Economic Recovery Advisory Board which engineered the Obama economic
disaster to US economy. Member of anti business “Progressive Policy”
organization.

11. Energy and Environment Czar: Carol Brower- Political Radical
-Former head of EPA -- known for anti-business activism. Strong
anti-gun ownership.

12. Faith-Based Czar: Joshua DuBois Political Black activist-Degree in Black Nationalism. Anti gun ownership lobyist.

13. Great Lakes Czar: Cameron Davis- Chicago radical anti business
environmentalist. Blames George Bush for “Poisoning the water that
minorities have to drink.” No experience or training in water
management. Former ACORN Board member

14. Green Jobs Czar: Van Jones- (since resigned). Black activist Member
of American communist Party and San Francisco Communist Party who said
Geo Bush caused the 911 attack and wanted Bush investigated by the
World Court for war crimes. Black activist with strong anti-white
views.

15. Guantanamo Closure Czar: Daniel Fried –Rights activist for Foreign
Terrorists. Believes America has caused the war on terrorism.

16. Health Czar: Nancy-Ann DeParle.. Former head of Medicare /
Medicaid. Strong Health Care Rationing proponent. She is married to a
reporter for The New York Times.

17. Information Czar: Vivek Kundra- born in New Delhi, India. Controls
all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors
all private Internet emails.

18. International Climate Czar: Todd Stern- Anti business former White
House chief of Staff- Strong supportrer of the Kyoto Accord. Pushing
hard for Cap and Trade. Blames US business for Global warming.

19. Intelligence Czar: Dennis Blair- Ret Navy. Stopped US guided
missile program as “provocative”. Chair of ultra liberal “Council on
Foreign Relations” which blames American organizations for regional
wars.

20. Mideast Peace Czar: George Mitchell Fmr. Sen from Maine- Left wing
radical. Has said Israel should be split up into “2 or 3 “ smaller more
manageable plots”. Anti-nuclear, anti-gun & pro homosexual.

21. Pay Czar: Kenneth Feinberg- Chief of Staff to TED KENNEDY. Lawyer who got rich off the 911 victims payoffs.

22. Regulatory Czar: Cass Sunstein- Liberal activist judge-believes
free speech needs to be limited for the “common good”. Rules against
personal freedoms many times –like private gun ownership.

23. Science Czar: John Holdren- Fierce ideological environmentalist,
Sierra Club, Anti business activist. Claims US business has caused
world poverty. No Science training.

24. Stimulus Accountability Czar: Earl Devaney- spent career trying to
take guns away from American citizens. Believes in Open Borders to
Mexico. Author of statement blaming US gun stores for drug war in
Mexico.

25. Sudan Czar: J. Scott Gration- Native of Democratic Republic of
Congo. Believes US does little to help Third World countries. Council
of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United
Nations.

26. TARP Czar: Herb Allison- Fannie May CEO responsible for the US
recession by using real estate mortgages to back up the US stock
market. Caused millions of people to lose their life savings.

27. Terrorism Czar: John Brennan- Anti CIA activist. No training in
diplomatic or gov. affairs. Believes Open Borders to Mexico and a
dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military.

27. Technology Czar: Aneesh Chopra- No Technology training. Worked for
the Advisory Board Company, a health care think tank for hospitals.
Anti doctor activist. Supports Obama Health care Rationing and salaried
doctors working exclusively for the Gov. health care plan.

28. Urban Affairs Czar: Adolfo Carrion Jr.- Puerto Rican. Anti American
activist and leftist group member in Latin America. Millionaire “slum
lord” of the Bronx, NY. Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got
from “sweetheart” deals with labor unions. Wants higher taxes to pay
for minority housing and health care.

29. Weapons Czar: Ashton Carter- Leftist. Wants all private weapons in
US destroyed. Supports U N ban on firearms ownership in America. No
Other “policy”

30. Weapons of Mass Destruction Policy Czar: Gary Samore- Former US
Communist. Wants US to destroy all WMD unilaterally as a show of good
faith. Has no other “policy”.

The FFC czar Mike Lloyd (former NBC reporter) supported Marxist-Leninist Hugo Chavas restrictions on media. Anita Dunn speaking out and saying she liked Mao Zedong Thought and Mother Teresa. You should check out the newunionparty.org for its awkward wording. Cas Sunstien belives people must op out of the organ donorship and that every american should be automatically signed in it. Cas Sunstien wrote a marxist novel called "Second Bill or Rights" which explained that everybody had a right to welfare, right to act against a unfair job and right to a job. Information Czar wants to put controls on the Internet. Carole Browner was some high ranking official for Sustainable World Society, a socialist organization that says "rich countries must shrink their economies by $300 billion a year to address climate change". There is no climate change, it's just eco-socialism cap and trade. Earth Day is V.I. Lenin's birthday. George Mitchell perferred the Israel and Palestin to perform peace talks, but it failed due to the too much liberaliness of George. The science czar John Holdren wants population controls like China and wants forced abortion and compulsory sterilization.

Our country was becoming a Theocracy/Dictatorship with ACORN and Americorps and SCEI Merging into a supercorp to steal votes from "that other party" just so we can look like Brazil with PT all the time, man. And Obama doesn't care... be...cause he's Marxist and smiley face fascist already See, it's more ethical to be a republican and not ethical to bankrupt US over nationalized healthcare. Its a hostile smiley face fascist Marxist government takeover for a very long time or until we turn into social democracy! Good thing ACORN is being destroyed as we speak.

As far as "global warming" or Cap and trade/BTU tax bill, the Worker's World Party (a 3rd American Communist Party after CPUSA, Socialist Labour Party), endorsed the Green Party presidential candinate. CPUSA endorsed the democrat party. This arrives at the conclusion that American communists love cap and trade, because "green hell" is inextinishable with marxism.

http://www.workers.org/2008/editorials/cynthia_mckinney_0724/

http://www.cpusa.org/article/view/975/

Something is wrong with Wikipedia! Protecting the commies and healthcare no doubt.





Chinese pop culture loves Obama

Smith Act/U.S.C. § 2385 was used against CPUSA for "knowingly or willfully advocate, abet, advise or teach the duty, necessity, desirability or propriety of overthrowing the Government of the United States or of any State by force or violence, or for anyone to organize any association which teaches, advises or encourages such an overthrow, or for anyone to become a member of or to affiliate with any such association."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_Act



100% debt of GDP isn't politically correct. We're essentially bankrupted.

http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/3834/debt.png

Politically correct is giving terrorists civilian trials? Why? Our president is Marxist-Leninist from Chicago, because CPUSA was founded in Chicago. Leninists believe that every minority race is a victim and must be tried even when its ununformed terrorists. . Then the CPUSA moved to NYC and Hiliary is "progressive". She likes to mix and match it with the white house. Chicago and NYC. The reason why the President is in Campaign mode is National Conventions of the CPUSA. The White House Czars (small vanguard party) must be his National Committee

http://www.cpusa.org/cpusa-constitution/

http://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/obamaczars_all_the_presidents_czars.jpg

The FCC czar wanted the big brother fairness doctorine, but admited he likes the Marxist Leninist totaltarian Hugo Chavas of Venezuela . The energy czar and energy security thinks that the global warming idea is not a fraud and despite Australia alienating their cap and trade bill; that they're going to ignore Australia and every other country. It's about all the socialist poor countries getting millions US Dollars from the nearly bankrupted progressive-in-name-only USA. Obama doesn't believe that Medicare is a huge ponzi scheme and the elderly aren't commiting generational thief (but they are), and Van Jones was just plain a CPUSA politician who got on board due to a bizzare amount of loop holes just like Atina Dunn.

Here is what communist community organizer Saul Alinsky, author of "Rules for Radicals" said in his book, "Last we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical, from all our legends, mythology leaves off and history (and who knows where the mythology leaves off and history begins or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that be at least won his own kingdom - Lucifer." So Marxism is evil even according to the radical.

http://www.capanddividend.org/?q=node/233

http://mindyourowndamnbusinesspolitics.com/wordpress/2009/06/27/cap-and-trade-challenge-your-senators-to-read-the-bill/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/18/AR2009051802647.html

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/how-much-cap-and-trade-bill-would-cost-families/

http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/10/05/copenhagen-treaty-will-demand-american-taxpayers-buy-dignity-for-third-world/

http://www.americansolutions.com/energytax/2009/12/what-you-should-know-about-copenhagen.php

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/08/communist_party.html

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090920205435AAP7kjL

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/08/communist_party_1.php

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cpusa-obama-win-will-change-us-forever

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_JtTfGekhAhY/SO_wb9UCk1I/AAAAAAAABtk/PfW8Upg5Q3g/s1600-h/obama.JPG

http://www.glowfoto.com/static_image/20-203351L/6672/jpg/09/2010/img6/glowfoto

This is probably a social engineering tactic, but the communist party of China and CPUSA are turning into "Social Democracy" to liberalize their economies. We know liberalize as making capitalist economies. That still isn't an excuse for czars and marxist leninists in the executive branch or EPA to lie and say we're the "New Democratic Party" (Canada). WE know that Nancy Polosi isn't going a great job at liberalizing; otherwise Michael Steele wouldn't demand to fire Polisi.

http://www.marxists.org/history/usa/parties/cpusa/encyclopedia-american-left.htm

www.cpusa.org/convention-discussion-the-old-bug-of-opportunism-returns

The republican party is the economic liberalism party in reality and does the most liberalization. Vote for Republicans instead. The ecnonomy is getting worse, not better. Democratic Party not doing good post-communism liberalization. The Mass treasurer Tim Cahill (independent) says that we have 4 years before inflation arrives and also our credit rating turns into AA rating. Nancy Pelosi is crazier; I agree she should be removed. She makes Chinese politicians look bad with her spending.

Economic liberalism

http://politifi.com/news/Massachusetts-Treasurer-blasts-state-health-care-plan-a-model-for-ObamaCare-609540.html

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100317053743AAacFBu

http://politifi.com/news/He-Should-Know-Massachusetts-Treasurer-Says-ObamaCare-Will-Bankrupt-the-Nation-in-Four-Years-291097.html

Kucinich was quoted in the Baltimore Sun as saying:

"I strongly encourage all of my supporters to make Barack Obama their second choice. Sen. Obama and I have one thing in common: Change.”

To which Obama replied:

“I have a lot of respect for Congressman Kucinich, and I’m honored that he has done this because we both believe deeply in the need for fundamental change. He and I have been fighting for a number of the same priorities -- including an end to the war in Iraq that we both opposed from the start."

CPUSA Chairman Sam Webb;

Finally, we should have a positive attitude toward the candidacy of Congressman Dennis Kucinich. Despite the efforts of the media to sideline him, Kucinich is emerging as a leading voice of the broad people’s coalition. He brings consistent anti-right, anti-corporate, pro-peace positions to the presidential primaries and debates. None of the other candidates can make the same claim. The more he speaks to audiences of the core forces, the better positioned the movement will be to win in 2008 and to fight the good fight in 2009.

Download 700 KB
Mirror 550 KB

^ extract the ebook file in rar with 7zip file manager to get html files

Obama is a Trotskyist / Trot!

" The Federal Reserve Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Treasury Department threaten to become, in effect, mere implementers of a global economic strategy designed by the IMF and the G-20 countries." Richard Morris

"If we let him keep control of Congress in 2011 and 2012, he will destroy our free enterprise system and replace it with government control of all aspects of our lives. He will work with the Europeans to enslave us in a global socialist system." Richard Morris

http://pastehtml.com/view/1cow9um.txt
http://pastehtml.com/view/1cowaz6.txt

great promise and historic purpose in the world." But, Obama says, "America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, and the world cannot meet them without America

Barack Obama "America must commit to strengthening the pillars of a just society. We can help build accountable institutions that deliver services and opportunity... . In countries wracked by poverty and conflict, citizens long to enjoy freedom from want. And since extremely poor societies and weak states provide optimal breeding grounds for disease, terrorism, and conflict, the United States has a direct national security interest in dramatically reducing global poverty and joining with our allies in sharing more of our riches to help those most in need"


Gramscians view the international system as an integrated capitalist system in pursuit of capital accumulation. Troyskists have a Vanguard Party and the Gramscians has consul communism. I say Gramscian, because he was a part of the neo-marxist "New Party" in 1995 before joining Democratic Party.

Theoretical Approach

In the mainstream approaches to international or global political economy the ontological centrality of the state is not in question. In contrast, Neo-Gramscianism, using an approach which Henk Overbeek calls transnational historical materialism, "identifies state formation and interstate politics as moments of the transnational dynamics of capital accumulation and class formation".[3] It contrasts with the positivism and social constructivist approaches of mainstream perspectives through "a rejection of the separation between subject and object... and the adoption of a dialectic understanding of reality as a dynamic totality and as a unity of opposites."

Hegemony

The neo-Gramscian view of hegemony is distinct from the realist view of hegemony. Realists view hegemony as the "predominant power of a state (or a group of states)."[5] Gramscians look at hegemony in terms of class relations. A class is considered hegemonic if it has legitimized its dominance through institutions and concessions.[6] When a class has established dominance in this way, as well as in the formal political structural of a state, then it constitutes a historic bloc. Neo-Gramscians argue that, because of globalisation, a neoliberal transnational historic bloc exists or is coming into existence.

Counterhegemony

A counterhegemony refers to an alternate normative interpretation of the functioning of social, economic, and political institutions. If a counterhegemony grows large enough it is able to subsume and replace the historic bloc it was born in. Neo-Gramscians use the Machiavellian terms war of position and war of movement to explain how this is possible. In a war of position a counterhegemonic movement attempts, through persuasion or propaganda, to increase the number of people who share its view on the hegemonic order; in a war of movement the counterhegemonic tendencies which have grown large enough overthrow, violently or democratically, the current hegemony and establish themselves as a new historic bloc.

The world in a down-ward liberal spiral, maybe even a Troskyist/Frankfurt School governed US society (we all know VI Lenin and Leon Trosky scored high on SAT test) where there is no money in the treasury. The greater good is a free market society with a healthy treasury that has centre-left, centre-right politics over state-capitalist society.

State-capitalist society is basically just a vision of VI Lenin had in the USSR in 1910 that was inevitable. Liberals think it is great because the government brainwashes citizens, taxes citizens very highly, and citizens cannot do whatever he/she want to do. The public sector always costs the private sector taxes so the private sector has to be many times larger; therefore, all the jobs need to be in the private sector. We don't have free houses. Trosky believed in soviet democracy with the Revolutionary Socialist party and proletarian internationalism, and some Trot variants (1) believe USSR was state-capitalist. In The Anti-Œdipus, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari followed up 3rd Reich's problem: "why did the masses desire fascism?", which led them to a critique of Freudo-Marxism (aka Frankfurt School).

http://pastehtml.com/view/1df7zwd.html

Frankfurt School controlling Family, Education, Drug, Music, Television and Popular Culture, and sex.

Marxism-Leninism: A Flourishing Science that:

"Scientific socialism, Marxism-Leninism, is the only basis on which the present deep crisis of capitalist society can be analyzed, and the ways out of the impasse into which imperialism and its ruling element has driven its countries, can be determined...

"Those who maintain that Marxism-Leninism is 'outdated' and that the fundamental ideas of Marx, Engels and Lenin are 'incompetent' may be asked: whose teaching is it that provided and continues to provide solutions to all the agonizing problems facing millions upon millions of people in the capitalist world...

"Why are capitalist countries continually gripped by economic crises, who do the poor there grow poorer and the rich grow richer, why is there unemployment, with millions of people deprived of jobs? Why is ruin the lot of millions of farmers? What are the causes of the first and second world wars? Why are militarization and the arms race being intensified in capitalist countries, and preparations are under way for new wars?

"No bourgeois or petty-bourgeois theory has been able to answer these vital and burning questions. Marxism-Leninism is the only teaching that gives substantiated scientific answers to these and other problems of our time, and shows the ways and means of resolving them." (Boris N. Ponomarev, Marxism-Leninism: A Flourishing Science, 1979, International Publishers)


Firstly, there is “a new economic model …high road development …the best thinking that he represents is now reflected in the White House.”

Secondly, “…the New Party, which is now the Working Families Party…the idea of a ‘new politics’ that you could actually have in this country bringing together labor, civil rights, feminists…and actually make a difference…is the basic framework for what just took over the White House.”

Thirdly, …”his idea of a new energy paradigm. His founding the Apollo Alliance. I believe the stimulus is going to put something like $80 billion in this direction…”

Jones credits Rogers with dreaming up the White House economic model – basically a 21st century “green” version of corporate socialism. Rogers also allegedly masterminded the electoral alliance that put Obama in the driver’s seat. He then founded the organization that helped write the “stimulus bill”, which is now funneling billions into a movement primarily designed to keep the Obama and the Democrats in power.

That’s a lot of influence for one man. Does Van Jones exaggerate? Let’s investigate.

The New Party which Rogers and Dan Cantor founded in the early 90s, was an attempt to to unite the poor, Blacks, Latinos , labor and “community groups” to work with and inside the Democratic Party to elect large numbers of leftist candidates to public office.

The party was essentially amalgam of four organizations -radical Washington DC “think tank” the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN).

The first strategic meetings to plan the New Party were held in Joel Rogers’ home in Madison Wisconsin in the very early 1990s. Present were Rogers’ wife Sarah Siskind, Dan Cantor (now leading the New party spin-off Working Families Party in New York) , ACORN leaders Wade Rathke , Zach Polett , Steve Kest and Jon Kest and IPS linked activists Steve Cobble , Harriet Barlow and Sam Pizzigati .

The very first meeting included Gerry Hudson from DSA and SEIU and early ACORN leader and IPS affiliate Gary Delgado. Anthony Thigpenn, from Los Angeles was also approached, but though supportive, did not wish to play a leadership role.

Incidentally, both Delgagdo and Thigpenn were later supporters of Van Jones’ anti Iraq War magazine War Times.

The party was socialist in character, but only revealed its true nature to friends.

In March 28-30 1997 Democratic Socialists of America convened their annual Socialists Scholars Conference at Borough of Manhattan Community College, New York. Barack Obama, incidentally, attended some of these conferences in the early 1980s.

The 1997 conference was themed “Radical alternatives on the eve of the millennium”.

Invitees were asked to join the debate on “changes in the labor movement, Marxist theory, the state of the economy, market socialism, and other areas where theory and practice meet…listen to the United States’ only independent and socialist congressman, Rep. Bernie Sanders…”dialogue with Joel Rogers of the New Party… ”

Barack Obama joined the New Party in Chicago, during his 1995 Illinois State Senate run. Obama was also a leader of the Chicago New Party sister organization , Progressive Chicago, as far back as 1993. Other Progressive Chicago leaders included Keith Kelleher of SEIU and ACORN, Kelleher’s wife, Madeline Talbott (ACORN) and Ron Sable, Danny K . Davis and Lou Pardo of DSA.

The New Party relied on “fusion” voting for its success. Candidates ran on both the Democrat and New Party lines, combing the vote totals from both. This practice was illegal in many states, so in 1997, Rogers and his wife Sarah Siskind took a case to the Supreme Court seeking to overturn the state bans.

Sarah Siskind

According to the The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel December 5, 1996;

With allusions to possible electoral chaos, justices of the U.S. Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday over an effort to overturn 40 state laws that forbid nominations of the same candidate by more than one political party.

The high court heard arguments in a case from Minnesota that was orchestrated by a Wisconsin couple Joel Rogers, a University of Wisconsin-Madison law professor, and his wife, Madison attorney Sarah E. Siskind.

Rogers is a co-founder and national chair of the New Party, which describes itself as progressive and claims 10,000 members nationwide. The party has elected candidates for local offices in Wisconsin and elsewhere.

The case failed and ‘”fusion” voting was ruled unconstitutional. Deprived of its main tactic, the New Party, went into sharp decline, surviving under the Working Families Party banner in New York and a few other states.

Coincidentally, Sarah Siskind worked for the the Madison Wisconsin office of Barack Obama’s Chicago law firm, Miner, Barnhill and Galland.

In 2002 Sarah Siskind represented ACORN in a successful class action against sub-prime mortgage lender Household Finance Corporation.

According to Miner, Barnhill and Galland;

For the last ten years, the firm (principally Sarah Siskind) has also represented individual consumers and organizational plaintiffs in class action lawsuits challenging predatory lending practices. These include a series of deceptive practices actions brought in Illinois, California and Massachusetts against Household Finance Corporation, and recently consolidated in In re Household Lending Litigation, Case No. C-02-1240 and Related Cases, N.D. Ca.) and settled for $152 million in benefits and future practice change relief…

Siskind won a settlement against Household Finance Corporation which gave delinquent borrowers interest rate reductions, waivers of unpaid late charges, deferral of accrued unpaid interest and principal reductions.

It was a socialist “win-win” situation. Siskind and Miner, Barhill & Galland made money, ACORN was able to force another mortgage lender to make more soft loans to its “core constituency” and the 2008 sub-prime mortgage collapse was brought one step closer.

Some commentators have surmised that some socialists leftists, working through ACORN and similar groups may have deliberately promoted sub- prime lending as a way of creating economic chaos, thereby provoking a subsequent increase in government involvement in the economy.

They point to the now famous Cloward-Piven Strategy devised in th e 1960s by Richard Cloward and his wife Frances Fox Piven. The “Cloward-Piven” plan involved enrolling as many people as possible onto state welfare programs. The point was to overload and collapse the state systems, leading to a Federal takeover of welfare.

Interestingly, when Richard Cloward died in 2001, 500 people gathered at the CUNY Graduate Center in New York City to celebrate his life and work. Speakers included Frances Fox Piven, Barbara Ehrenreich, Cornel West, (all New Party founders and DSA members) Gus Newport (DSA member) Howard Zinn (New Party founder), Joel Rogers and Miles Rapoport.

Coincidentally Rapoport was the president of the New York based “think tank” Demos, an official partner organization of the Institute for Policy Studies and a close ally of ACORN.


Barack Obama helped establish Demos in 1999-2000 and became a Trustee of the organization. Van Jones also later served as a Demos Trustee, but is currently on leave.

In 1998 Chicago DSA activist and IPS affiliate James Weinstein presided over a major Chicago “Back to Basics” conference designed to re-align the U.S. left back to “class politics”

To explore how we (the Left) can increase our presence in the mainstream of American political and intellectual life.

Speakers included Dr. Quentin Young (DSA member , New Party founder , Barack Obama long time friend , mentor and physician) Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz (a San Francisco based activist and comrade of Van Jones’), plus DSA comrades Christine Riddiough, Joseph Schwartz and Roberta Lynch.

Joel Rogers, founder of The New Party, listed people’s concerns: education, campaign finance reform, environment, raising the minimum wage, and concern about global capitalism. Neither Democrats nor Republicans take this list seriously. Liberalism relied on favorable government regulation and mass politics to deal with problems. A new time calls for new politics, emphasizing economic strategy, citizen participation, and electoral strategy.

In 2004, Joel Rogers from the Center On Wisconsin Strategy, and Robert Borosage from IPS enlisted DSA friendly Steelworkers President Leo Gerard and SEIU President Andy Stern, to propose a new alliance of labor, environmental groups, business and “social justice” leaders – the Apollo Alliance. The Alliance, which soon included over 200 supporting organizations, released a report “High Road or Low Road? Job Quality in the New Green Economy” arguing for a ten-year program of investment in a “clean energy, good jobs” economy.”

Joel Rogers was the Alliance’s founding chairman and continues to serve on its board. Borosage is also a board member, as is Leo Gerard. John Podesta from the Center for American Progress also serves, but took a break while co-chairing President Obama’s “transition”, where he

“coordinated the priorities of the incoming administration’s agenda, oversaw the development of its policies, and spearheaded its appointments of major cabinet secretaries and political appointees.”

Podesta also looked after another Apollo Alliance board member Van Jones, giving him a job with Center for American Progress , when Jones was forced to exit the White House.

Besides Rogers, two old New Party affiliates are involved in the Apollo Alliance. Gerry Hudson of DSA and SEIU serves as a board member. Anthony Thigpenn serves on the Apollo Alliance advisory board and runs the Apollo affiliate in Los Angeles – which trains “anti racist environmental organizers.”

Thigpenn is a former member of the Maoist leaning Black Panther Party, but that’s pretty mild by Apollo standards. The former head of the New York Apollo Alliance Jeff Jones, once led the terrorist Weather Underground Organization with he and President Obama’s ‘s mutual friends , Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Former DSA youth leader and SEIU organizer Ron Ruggiero, serves as Apollo Alliance National Field Director.

It’s a safe bet that a good portion of the “stimulus package” $80 Billion dollars will be going to Van Jones’ Green For All in San Francisco in San Francisco, to Anthony Thigpenn’s “environmental anti racism” trainers in Los Angeles and Jeff Jones’ former crew in New York.

Vladimir Lenin

Any good Leninist will tell you. It is not gaining power that is important, it is the KEEPING of power.

Joel Rogers’ New Party, modeled the movement that put Obama in power. His Apollo Alliance provides a means for holding that power.

It is essentially a massive patronage system, where huge amounts of taxpayer’s money is channeled into radical led “green” camouflaged mass organizations.

These “green” armies will be the vote herders of the future. They will confront the Tea Party movement and other patriots on the streets of America. They will be the paramilitary armies used to intimidate the very people who fund them.

’s 1996 endorsement by the New Party: which raises the question: what is the New Party? It’s easy to allege that this group is closely tied to former communists, but digging in to the New Party and Obama’s involvement, a very dirty picture presents itself. In fact, it is abundantly apparent that Barack Obama not only knew what the New Party was when he sought its endorsement, but through his ties with ACORN, the radical left activist organization, Obama used his radical left connections to get elected to the Illinois State Senate.

Most of the New Party’s history has been lost in the digital age. It was established in 1992 and started to die out in 1998, well before Google and the modern web were established. But through lengthy searches of the Nexis archive and microfilm at the local university library, I’ve been able to piece this together.

The New Party was established in 1992 “by union activist Sandy Pope and University of Wisconsin professor Joel Rogers,” USA Today reported on November 16, 1992. The paper wrote that the new party was “self-described [as] ‘socialist democratic.’”

Throughout its creation and rise, the New Party sought to unite alienated leftists who had grown disgusted by Bill Clinton’s embrace of the center-left Democratic Leadership Council. The Wisconsin State Journal summed up where the Left was in February of 1992. “Angry Americans,” Jesse Waldman wrote, “particularly left-wing Democrats, are tired of choosing between the lesser of two evils when they go to the ballot now.” A July 4, 1996, column in the Los Angeles Times by Todd Gitlin, which championed the New Party as “both old-fashioned and elegant” proclaimed the New Party as a path to victory for leftists alienated by the Democrats and Republicans. Capturing the mood of the left in a May 31, 1998 article for the leftist magazine In These Times, Doug Ireland wrote, “As Bob Master of the Communication Workers of America — the point-man for the new labor ballot line — puts it: ‘The political perspective of labor and working people has no voice in state politics, especially since the Democratic Party has moved to the right.”

The seeds, however, had been sown all the way back in 1988. Quoting John Nichols in the March 22, 1998 issue of In These Times, “The roots of the New Party go back to the aftermath of Jesse Jackson’s run for president in 1988. At that time, Dan Cantor, who had served as labor coordinator for the Jackson campaign, and University of Wisconsin sociology professor Joel Rogers began talking about how to formulate an alternative between the increasingly indistinguishable Democratic-Republican monolith.”

It is no great leap to say, as a result, that Barack Obama’s rise to the Democratic nomination is the child of Jesse Jackson’s defeat.

Read on . . .

Understanding Fusion

In light of dissatisfaction with the Democrats' rightward drift, the New Party set about establishing itself as a third-party third-way for ballot access. “Fusion,” was the idea. Continuing with Jesse Waldman from the Wisconsin State Journal, “[Fusion] would allow a left-wing candidate … to run as both a Democrat and [a third party] candidate. Proponents of this ‘fusion’ strategy include Mary K. Baum, co-chair of Wisconsin Labor-Farm, and Joel Rogers, a UW-Madison law and sociology professor who has helped organize The New Party.”

Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate, let’s call him Barack Obama, received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama’s New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.

The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful. “[The Wall Street] Journal’s editorialists fretted last fall about how the New Party was responsible for a labor movement that was drifting leftward …. As [openly declared socialist] Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) puts it, ‘If the Wall Street Journal editorial page goes after you, you can pretty well bet you’re doing the right thing.’”

Nichols’s article goes into detail about the New Party’s scope. “After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century …. In 1996, it helped Chicago’s Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district …. The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued.”

Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1998 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept unconstitutional was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.1

Onward to the Socialist Utopia

The New Party was designed as a loose confederation of unions, socialists, communists, and black activists who shared common values, but often had different goals. According to John Nichols, its party platform included:

full employment
a shorter work week
a guaranteed minimum income for all adults and a universal “social wage”
full public financing of elections with universal voter registration
“the democratization of banking and financial systems”, which included public control and regulation of banking
a more progressive tax system
reductions in military spending and an end to unilateral military interventions.

In Arkansas, Minnesota, Oregon, and other places the New Party has worked hand in hand with ACORN and local unions to block public policy changes that have included prison expansion, government subsidized stadiums, and zoning changes to bring in “big box” stores. In 2000, Missoula County, Montana Commissioner Barbara Evans, after fighting the New Party over buidling a home-improvement store, told the Oregonian, “They’re bad news. I consider them socialist-communist in their beliefs.”

On December 1, 1994, after the Gingrich revolution swept the Democrats from congress and forced Bill Clinton to triangulate, the Chicago Tribune ran an article by Steve Mills entitled “Looking for the Left: The Old Progressives and Marxists Still Breathe Idealist Fire, but They’re Too Spintered to Generate Any Heat.”

“‘The Left is in crisis, and it has been for some time,’ said Carl Davidson, the former national secretary for the radical Students for a Democratic Society. ‘I don’t know if it’s even bottomed out yet,’” he reported to Mr. Mills. Mills continued, “The Socialist Workers Party is in this corner; the International Socialist Organization is in this one. The [communist group Committee of Correspondence] is in another. The radicals, or even the liberals with some radical leanings — so-called ‘soft radicals’ — seem to find it hard to abandon individual issues for a broader movement.”

But, Mills reported, “It is amid this political confusion that The New Party would like to step in. ‘If there’s anything that defines the American Left, it’s fragmentation,’ said Dan Cantor, the party’s national organizer.… The New Party aims to change that. By uniting the progressives behind a cohesive ideology, one that, in theory at least, will have room for all the factions that now litter the landscape of the Left, The New Party is confident progressives can again be strong.”

The New Party, ACORN, and Growth

Steve Mills, writing for the Chicago Tribune, spent some time surveying where the New Party stood in 1994 Chicago, two years before Obama sought and received its endorsement. “Although its Chicago organization is not yet fully formed, in other parts of the country it has run candidates in local races.” The races had, at that time, all been fairly small. However, they had not yet fully connected with Barack Obama. Dan Cantor, ironic given Obama’s preacher problems of late, summed up his vision for the New Party as it headed into Chicago, telling Steve Mills, “We’re of that Left tradition that thinks we could have a majority out there someday.… We want to build a church, not a sect. Because if the Left is going to amount to anything, it’s going to be made up of groups have have reached their limit on one issue.”

In 1993, the New Party had moved into New York to be a major player. Newsday’s Bob Liff interviewed Jan Pierce, the local organizer for the New Party. Pierce told Liff that David Dinkins was the type of progressive candidate New Party members liked. As the party tried to take off in New York, it was not only trying to get access to the ballot, “but to have some ideological purity.” In fact, the New Party had made such a name for itself that Al Sharpton had considered an attempt at the New Party’s endorsement for the United States Senate.

In 1995, Newsday reported “New Party-endorsed candidates have run in 120 elections for school board and zoning board and city councils, winning 77 races, including a Chicago alderman’s slot.”

By 1996, the New Party had solidified its ties with ACORN, unions, and the left so much so that even the New York Times referred to it as “leftist.” Manning Marable, writing in the left-wing New York Beacon, on October 23, 1996, wrote that “there are four key components in this strategy for progressive political change.” Among those components were civil disobedience and “support for independent movements like the New Party which are running candidates in local races. More importantly an innovative approach to electoralism is represented by ACORN’s ‘living wage’ referenda campaigns.”

The Chicago Democratic Socialists of America were quite pleased in 1996 with the New Party’s success including the election of “Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, [who] encouraged [New Party members] to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration”. (h/t to Rick Moran)

In These Times reported on February 17, 1997, that “the [New] [P]arty, with 80 members in the [17th] ward, many of whom are also active in the Service Employees International Union and the advocacy group ACORN, has begun to build a parallel precinct organization.”

Obama’s Rise

With the New Party’s rise and its entanglements with ACORN came the rise of Barack Obama. According to Stanley Kurtz, “Acorn is the key modern successor of the radical 1960’s ‘New Left,’ with a ‘1960’s-bred agenda of anti-capitalism’ to match.” And Barack Obama was ACORN’s lawyer.

Using his position at ACORN in 1995, Obama set up the playing field for his election the following year. The Boston Globe reports, “Obama was part of a team of attorneys who represented the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in a lawsuit against the state of Illinois in 1995 for failing to implement a federal law designed to make it easier for the poor and others to register as voters. A federal court ordered the state to implement the law.” The Globe also notes, “Obama was part of a team of lawyers representing black voters and aldermen that forced Chicago to redraw ward boundaries that the City Council drew up after the 1990 census. They said the boundaries were discriminatory. After an appeals court ruled the map violated the federal Voting Rights Act, attorneys for both sides drew up a new set of ward boundaries.”

With districts redrawn, ingratiating himself to black politicians on his side of the city, and rules loosened on voter registration, Obama could set out to run. And he did. Obama sought the New Party endorsement, which required him to sign a contract that he would keep up his relationship with the New Party.

The end of the story is simple. Obama won the New Party’s nomination and, through fusion with his Democratic votes, he became the Democratic nominee. Using ACORN’s get out the vote efforts and relying on his gerrymandered Democrat district, Obama moved on to the State Senate. While there, he paid back the New Party and the far left. He opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, he opposed legislation that would have prohibited the sale of pornography across the street from elementary schools and churches, and he supported allowing criminals to sue their victims if their victims injured the criminals in self-defense.

Fast forward twelve years and Obama is running as fast as he can away from the New Party brand. But beyond a shadow of a doubt, Barack Obama knew what he was getting into and remains an ideal New Party candidate. The New Party was, and as it still exists is, an amalgamation of the left and far left designed to attract far left candidates and move the Democratic Party back to the left. Barack Obama is an example of the New Party’s success.

Thank God William Rehnquist ruled fusionism unconstitutional when he did, or there’d be more of these latent communists on the march upward into the political establishment.